TO BE or NOT TO BE
If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!
When I was in college back in the 1980s (Willamette University in Salem, Oregon), I majored in Philosophy and so I learned about many interesting philosophers. One of my favorite philosophers was Rene Descartes, who is especially known for his question “to be or not to be?”. Here, Descartes is proposing the most profound of questions - is life worth it? To be means to live and to experience life in its fullest sense - pain, happiness, joy, sorry, anger, rage, peace, sleep, victory, loss, etc. The other end of the spectrum is “not being” which implies an absence of ALL things - not just an absence of the negative things. Life is just that - a combination deal - if you are going to study - you will experience both success and failure as a student (at least I did). As a professional, you will similarly experience both sides of the coin - challenges, successes, failures and disappointments. So, Rene Descartes asks us, which one is better - to be or not to be?
The answer for the Vedanta Philosopher (like me
) is quite easy: OM. The Sacred Syllable OM is the sound that represents BOTH being and non-being. OM is a monosyllable expression for the Absolute Presence of Existence which is transcendent to being and non-being alike. That is the power and amazing nature of OM - totally transcendent. So, the next time I run into a philosophy student who is perplexed at Rene Descartes’ philosophical dilemma - I will point him or her to classical Vedanta Philosophy of ancient India - which transcends even the great Tao of Chinese Philosophy, because ONE is the essence all TWO or dualistic ways of thinking. Give OM a chance - meditate on OM and soon you will experience for yourself the absolute oneness of all existence.
Indeed, OM says it all.


Written by Keith Johnson
August 13th, 2008









